Why does restaurant customer loyalty stall?
Restaurant customer loyalty stalls the moment a restaurant keeps repeating what once worked instead of continuing to listen to what guests experience today. Chef Syrco Bakker puts it this way: when you know your guests, you automatically fall back on the same formula. Structured guest feedback after every visit breaks that cycle.
How do you escape the proven formula?
The formula trap develops in three steps: a concept takes off, the team fine-tunes it, and after a few years fine-tuning turns into repeating. Syrco Bakker describes it as a path where you can still take 5 steps forward, but then you hit your limit. A restaurant escapes this by systematically collecting guest reactions right after the visit, handling criticism privately and responding to every review. That keeps your picture of the guest current instead of based on assumptions from the past.
When does experience become a trap?
When you know what works and stop testing because of it. Bakker says you then end up running "just the same formula a few years later", even with a new signature.
What does the career ladder tell you about guests?
Going from commis through chef de partie and sous chef to executive chef is a logical progression, but logical growth doesn't guarantee connection. The same goes for returning guests: more visits don't automatically mean more loyalty.
Which feedback keeps loyalty current?
Feedback requested within a few hours of the visit by email, text message or WhatsApp. Negative signals then reach you privately, before they appear on Google or TripAdvisor.
You know the guests and you know what works, so you automatically head in the same direction again.
Frequently asked questions
What is the formula trap in hospitality?
The formula trap is the pattern in which a restaurant repeats a concept because it was once successful. Chef Syrco Bakker describes how even a new signature drifts back in the same direction, because you know the guests and know what works. The result is stagnation: the restaurant can still grow a little, but it has hit its limit without noticing.
Why is a sidestep sometimes better than growing further?
According to Syrco Bakker, a sidestep can create room to take ten steps forward again, while an existing path only offers five. For restaurants, this means that deliberately breaking with habits, based on up-to-date guest insight, creates more room to grow than further polishing a familiar formula.
How do reviews help with customer loyalty?
Reviews show how guests experience a visit today, not how the team thinks they experience it. A common approach is to ask for feedback shortly after the visit, follow up on criticism privately and consistently respond to public reviews. That keeps your picture of the guest current and shows returning guests that their opinion makes a difference.
Try it on your own restaurant first.
Three days free. No login, nothing to install.
More from the knowledge base.
- Running a restaurant in a recession: how do you survive?Running a restaurant in a recession means refreshing your concept in time, before guests start to drift away.…
- What does restaurant sustainability really mean?Restaurant sustainability is about long-term thinking: lasting relationships with producers, development progr…
- Why are later dinner times becoming the norm?Later dinner times are taking hold, with dinner moving to 7 or 8 PM, because at today's prices guests who pay…
Video transcript
So you go from commis to CDP to sous chef to head chef to executive chef, and these are all logic steps, but it doesn't mean that it's really like that you get more energy out of your job, or it doesn't mean that you, sometimes you go past your, the essence why you became a chef. So from there on, yeah, from, from you see with the 2 stars, yeah, then the second step is maybe 3 stars. But we push ourselves in a kind of environment and method that is maybe not anymore like feeling connected with me.
And so then I was like, okay, can we, shall we do something, continue with something that is, that how it's supposed to be in the culinary world, or is it now time to cut and then, um, and to, to do something different? Of course, in different environment, I really needed it because, um, sometimes you need, really need to, because I really believe if, if I would open a restaurant close to Katant or in Netherlands or Belgium, um, I would say, oh yeah, I have a new signature and I do something different and blah blah blah. But, um, you know the guests and you know what works, so I think automatically you, you're going into the same direction again.
And then a few years later you just do the same formula because you know what it works. Um, so from that side, and, and yeah, I think it was a good moment to, to challenge myself, to, to jump in the deep and just really, um, and also, well, reinvent yourself in a way. And I really believe because of this, for me it feels like a sidestep to make again like 10 steps forwards instead of a route or a trail where you're on where you can still make 5 steps forward, but then you are on your limit.
So it feels like a sidestep to make again steps forward and do something really that's close to my values and my vision.